A Centenary Tribute
to a Sculptor’s Graphic Art
The
Life and Work
of Arnold Auerbach
Auerbach
is an interesting, if little-known,
artist of the Modern British school.
He made several outstanding pieces
in the 1920’s and 30’s
which show his participation in the
dialogue with international Modernism
which preoccupied the English avant-garde in
the period between the two world wars.
Born
in Liverpool, April 2, 1898, Auerbach
was the son of a tradesman, Jonas Auerbach
and wife Eva, née Levy. Auerbach’s
grandfather, Salomon, had emigrated from
Poland.
As
a boy Auerbach attended evening classes
at the Liverpool Institute, before
taking up full-time study at the Liverpool
School of Art, where he was awarded
a pupil teachership. At Liverpool he
received the good grounding in drawing
which was the basis of all British
art college education of the period.
Drawing, he was to write later, was
the link, the common factor, between
painting and sculpture. Relief sculpture
in particular he regarded as three-dimensional
drawing. Yet the sculptor’s
draughtsmanship, like that of artists
trained as architects, is generally marked
by a distinct quality and character that
distinguishes it from a painter’s
hand.
Invalided
out of the army in 1918, having been
drafted at the age of eighteen in 1916,
Auerbach returned initially to Liverpool
where he worked with the architect
James Bramwell, carrying out the interior
designs of new buildings with both relief
sculpture and mural decoration. Through
the inter-War years sculpture was to
be Auerbach’s main pre-occupation.
He
first exhibited in 1919, at the Maddox
Street Gallery in Liverpool and from
1921 he contributed to the annual Autumn ‘salons’ at
the city’s Walker Art Gallery.
In 1921 Auerbach moved to London where
he shared a studio with the painter Robert
Arthur Wilson, and exhibited work at
the noted Chenil Gallery. Later in the
same year he made his first visit to
the Continent, travelling through France
and Austria en route to Switzerland.
In Paris he was particularly impressed
by the contemporary sculpture of Maillol,
Archipenko, Laurens, Lipchitz and Zadkine,
though it was a few years before this
interest was reflected in his work.
He
celebrated his return to London and
artistic ‘coming of age’ in
a fine finished pencil self-portrait
(illustrated on the front cover) very
much in the tradition of the late Italian
Quattrocento, recalling portraits by
Piero della Francesca and Giovanni Bellini.
Northern European old master painters
such as Dürer and Rembrandt had
similarly portrayed themselves as a record
of different stages of their careers.
Auerbach’s Self-Portrait at
the age of twenty-four is the summation
of his student days; an avowal of his
powers as a draughtsman and an anticipation
of the art world opening before him.
He took a studio in Adelaide Road in
Hampstead and within a couple of years
showed for the first time at the Royal
Academy, in 1923.
Through
the 1920’s
Auerbach was commissioned as an architectural
sculptor to decorate the interiors
of several Art-Deco buildings. Little
of this work survives, for instance
The News Theatre in Shaftesbury Avenue,
which he ornamented with a relief tryptich
of standing female nudes with pleated
drapes, was destroyed in World War
II, though he kept the original plasters
in his studio till his death, and made
a related etching. A major commission
in 1927 was for the reliefs for the palace
of the Nawab of Rampur in India.
By
the mid-1920’s Auerbach’s
sculpture and drawings reflected an awareness
of Ancient Egyptian stance, simplification
and monumentality of form. In the later
20’s and the early 1930’s
he experimented with the broken planes,
angularity and semi-abstract patterning
of cubism.
During the Second World War Auerbach
took up his first teaching post, at Beckenham
Art School, replacing Henry Carr who
had been appointed a War Artist. After
the War he was invited to join the staff
of the Regent Street Polytechnic, first
in the School of Architecture, later
in the School of Art where he taught
still life and portrait painting. Subsequently
he was at Chelsea School of Art, until
his retirement in 1964. Afterwards he
continued to teach at the Stanhope Institute
until 1968.
Ill
health had forced Auerbach to give
up making sculpture in the mid-1950’s
and concentrate on the less physically
demanding medium of painting.
After
World War II Auerbach had, in common
with many artists, returned to naturalism.
A series of etchings from 1949 is obviously
made directly from the model in lifeclass.
Several models recur in various plates
in different or repeated poses. Teaching
in art schools gave easy daily access
to life classes.
In his book Sculpture,
a History in Brief, written
in 1952, Auerbach discusses abstraction
and realism in general but thereby
gives an insight into his own attitudes
and approach.
If
the artist chooses abstract forms to
take the impress of his feelings it
is because, in so far as the forms
become more generalised, so much the
less will they tend to resemble particular
things in the natural world. The less
therefore they will be likely to convey
precise intellectual information, and
will the better respond to shades of
pure feeling… But
we are entitled, also, to ask whether
these abstract shapes are really capable
of carrying such a weight and variety
of meaning, or responding with sufficient
flexibility to … complex feelings.
Moreover, so enormous is the variety
of forms in nature, and so consistently
in front of our eyes, that it is almost
difficult to avoid making a shape which
is not in some degree reminiscent or
suggestive of living forms…
Yet
in reality, and in spite of the existence
of a natural tendency towards either
realism or abstraction, with extremes
at either end, the supposed opposition
of abstract or geometric shapes and
naturalistic ones is based on a misunderstanding
of the fundamental nature of art. Whether…made
in the likeness of anything else outside
itself or not, that descriptive likeness
is never its essential…quality.
The quality which is its irreducible
quality resides in its own physical shape
and the feelings which may be aroused
by the sort of order that shapes establishes.
For that order, that physical relationship
of the masses, the planes, the lines – its
form – is the representative spirit
of its maker.
This
sketch has been written with hardly
any direct mention of ‘beauty’,
the one quality which it has always been
the special business of art to produce.
For beauty comes perhaps better veiled.
The beauty of sculpture resides not in
what it records, though it may well record
beauty too, but in some fine shaping
of the material, so that the spirit enters
into its form. Where there is sculptural
form there is beauty, for the mark of
life is on it.
The Etchings
Auerbach
took up etching in the early 1920’s
during the Etching ‘Boom’ and
produced plates intermittently through
the 20’s and early 1930’s.
The images are sometimes entirely original
though more frequently related to his
contemporary drawings, paintings or sculpture.
They include London and Liverpool street
scenes, and studies of heads and figures.
The earliest plates are tonal and more
often in drypoint, which he could work
directly into the plate without ground
or need for acid. After 1926 there is
a greater emphasis on line and the drawing
is more schematic. Animals and female
nudes take the stage.
From
1928/9 to about 1934/35 Auerbach produced
several interesting cubistic designs,
quite outside the canons of traditional
Modern British etching. In general,
period impressions from these plates
are no longer available. In 1987 I
printed editions of 2 to 5 proofs only
from nine plates before selling the
plates. Specially for this centenary
exhibition Jeff Clarke ARE has kindly
printed small editions from two further
plates, and reprinted the two plates
from which only 2 proofs had been taken
in 1987.
After
1935 there is a hiatus of more than
a decade in Auerbach’s
etching output, during which he would
seem to have reassessed his relationship
to Modernism.
Ironically,
when he resumed etching after the War,
in the late 1940’s,
the market for black and white etchings
had collapsed, yet the following decade
saw his greatest activity in the medium.
At a period when ill health forced him
to abandon the greater physical rigours
of large scale sculpture, etching allowed
him to continue to explore the form of
the human figure now denied to him in
sculpture. His later paintings, by contrast,
were predominantly studio still lives.
The latest dated etching of which I am
aware is from 1960.
The
later plates are numerous and were
either drawn directly from the model
or are based on Auerbach’s
drawings, paintings and even sculpture,
sometimes from earlier decades. The
human figure predominates. The later
plates are more typically etched, rather
than the drypoint of the pre-War plates,
Often he used a double pointed stylus
which gives the effect of a broad freely-drawn
line searching out the form in a coming
to terms with a two-dimensional expression
of shapes he felt in the round.
Auerbach probably never owned his own
press but either used commercial plate
printers or the facilities of the art
colleges where he taught. Several of
the impressions left in his studio were
pattern proofs for the printer.
Auerbach
married late, only in 1954, to a charming
Scots lady, Jean Campbell, whom he
had first met towards the end of the
War. Jean was also a professional artist,
trained at the Glasgow School of Art,
who worked for many years as an artist
with the Admiralty. Now aged ninety-two
(in 1998) it is due to her generosity
that this exhibition is possible, as
the previous posthumous exhibition
of Auerbach’s sculpture. Arnold’s
sculpture was celebrated in an elegant
catalogue by René Reichard of
the Galerie Huber und Reichard in Offenbach
am Main. This brief tribute to Arnold
Auerbach as a graphic artist is dedicated
to Jean.
A5
(210 x 148.5 mm) ; 32 pages, with 34
illustrations of which 3 are in colour.
An exhibition catalogue of 41 items,
and a checklist of 142 etching plates,
all that remained in the artist’s
studio on his death.
(UK
price: £5, International orders: £8)
|